The conclusions must beĭrawn appropriately based on the data presented.Ģ. With appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research withĭata that supports the conclusions. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? On PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see. Provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please Work, including the source and any quality control testing procedures (authentication,Ĭharacterisation, and mycoplasma testing). Please provide additional information about each of the cell lines used in this Thank you for your attention to these requests.ģ. (3) Please describe the post-operative care received by the animals, including theįrequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being. (2) Please provide details of animal welfare (e.g., shelter, food, water, environmental
(1) Please state the number of mice used in the study Section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:
At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods The PLOS ONE style templates can be found atĢ. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.ġ. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. To enhance the reproducibility of your results. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io Guidelines for resubmitting your figure filesĪre available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your This as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
Please submit your revised manuscript by 11:59PM. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Upon receipt, I will review the changes before sending the manuscriptīack out for review. PleaseĪddress those concerns listed below and resubmit your manuscript with the appropriate Literature, and strength of experimental design are criteria for publication.
#REVEAL FOXMAIL PASSWORD IN SETTINGS FULL#
However, the clarity of presentation, full description of methods, citation of appropriate Is not a criterion for publication in this journal, regardless of the reviewers' comments. Serious concerns about the current version of the manuscript. Please see below for the comments from 2 reviewers. Manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the We feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteriaĪs it currently stands. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. In-depth Characterization and Comparison of the N-glycosylated Proteome of Two-dimensional-Īnd Three-dimensional-cultured Breast Cancer Cells and Xenografted Tumors
0 kommentar(er)
